Some booking records are never coming down. The case ended in a conviction that stands, or it is still open, and the county publishes it because the law says it must. No company deletes that, and the ones promising to are selling you something with a different name on the invoice.
Our main guide ends on that point. This page starts there. If removal is off the table, suppression is what is left, and these are the seven companies that do it on booking records specifically.
Reputation Revivor is one of the seven and publishes this page, so weigh our entry against the six we are ranked alongside rather than on its own.
Understand what you are buying before you compare prices
Suppression does not touch your record. It builds and promotes other pages about you until they rank above it, so someone searching your name finds those first and stops reading before they reach the booking photo.
Three things follow from that, and every honest quote reflects all three.
It takes months, not days. Six to twelve is normal, because you are competing against a page that has been indexed longer than yours have existed.
It never finishes. Stop paying and the pages you built stop being maintained and promoted, and the record climbs back. That is the single biggest difference from removal, and it is the one buyers discover late.
It works on the search result, not the record. Anyone running a background check through a data provider rather than a search engine still finds it. Suppression protects you from the casual search, which is most of them, and not from the formal one.
Compare on what is actually built, not on rankings promised
No company controls Google’s index, so a promised position is not a deliverable. What is a deliverable is the asset list: how many pages, on what domains, refreshed how often.
Ask for that in writing. A firm that will commit to publishing and maintaining a defined set of properties is describing work it can be held to. A firm that will only commit to an outcome it does not control is describing a hope.
| Company | Billing shape | Also removes | Founded |
|---|---|---|---|
 Reputation Resolutions |
Retainer, removals pay for performance | Yes | 2013 |
 Reputation Rhino |
Retainer, 30 day money back | Yes | 2011 |
 NetReputation |
Quote per case | Yes | 2014 |
 Guaranteed Removals |
Pay after results on removals | Yes | 2009 |
 Defamation Defenders |
Project, reported 500 to 5,000 | Yes | 2016 |
 InternetReputation.com |
Quote per case | Yes | 2008 |
 Reputation Revivor (publisher) |
Quote, not published | Yes | Not published |
The seven, and what each is actually good at
Reputation Resolutions
The billing structure is the reason to look here first. Removal work runs pay for performance while suppression bills as a retainer, which means the two are separated on the invoice rather than blended. On a booking record where some copies will come down and the county entry will not, that split is exactly the shape of the problem.
Colorado, accredited with the Better Business Bureau since 2014 with a reported clean complaint history. Independent review volume is very thin, roughly three verified reviews on Clutch and one on the BBB, so ask for references on records like yours.
Reputation Rhino
The only company here publishing an unconditional 30 day money back guarantee, which is unusual for work whose results arrive in month six. It gives you a real exit if the asset plan turns out to be thinner than the pitch.
New York based, founder is a former attorney, so legal routes sit alongside the suppression work. Reported project totals run from 10,000 dollars upward and legal fees may bill separately from the retainer. Only seven Clutch reviews were verifiable and the founding year is inconsistent across sources.
NetReputation
The broadest service menu of the seven, covering suppression, removal, monitoring and privacy removal in one engagement. That suits a booking record that has pulled other results up with it, which happens when arrest data feeds people search profiles and those profiles then rank too.
Sarasota, founded 2014, quote only. Breadth is where scope drifts, so get the asset list and the deliverables written down before starting.
Guaranteed Removals
Worth calling first for a reason that has nothing to do with suppression: their published guidance tells buyers to attempt removal themselves before hiring anyone. If any of your copies are removable, finding that out before you commit to a suppression retainer changes what you need to buy.
Canadian, running since 2009, covering mugshot and criminal record work alongside search, reviews and news. Pay after results applies to removals, not to retained suppression.
Defamation Defenders
The narrowest focus of the seven, concentrating on mugshot and arrest record work rather than treating it as one service among many. Boulder based, accredited since 2019 with an A rating.
Included with the same caveat as everywhere else on this site. They advertise guaranteed results, which is a claim that makes no sense applied to suppression, and several Trustpilot complaints describe paying substantial sums with no updates. If you engage them, get the asset list and the refund conditions in writing first.
InternetReputation.com
Long trading history, since 2008, with a 2015 Inc. 5000 placement, and suppression is a core part of the offering rather than an add-on.
Two things to establish on the first call. The assets were acquired by NetReputation in 2020, so the entity you contract with differs from the historical brand and also owns another company on this list. And complaint forums document billing and refund disputes, which matter more on a twelve month retainer than on a one off job.
Reputation Revivor
Ours, so apply more pressure here than to the six above.
We work booking records only, which means the properties we build are shaped around name searches rather than brand searches, and we clear whatever copies are removable before quoting suppression on the rest. We say on the first call when a record is public, current and staying, because quoting suppression as though it were removal is the thing this site exists to complain about.
What we would hold against us: no published pricing, no independent review record, and no published founding year or entity, which by the standard set in our guides is a fair reason to ask us harder questions than you ask the others.
Do these two things before you sign anything
Confirm which copies are genuinely unremovable. Suppression priced across twenty listings when eleven of them would have come down for free is the most expensive mistake in this category, and the check costs nothing.
Then agree what happens at month twelve. Suppression that is working still needs maintaining, and the retainer that built the position is rarely the retainer that holds it. A firm that has thought about this will have a lower maintenance rate ready. A firm that has not will quote you the same number forever.
If you want to know which of your listings are removable before you price suppression on any of them, a case review costs nothing.
Last updated on July 28, 2026